bzarcher: A Sylveon from Pokemon floating in the air, wearing a pair of wingtip glasses (Feather)
bzarcher ([personal profile] bzarcher) wrote2004-03-20 03:20 pm
Entry tags:

(no subject)

Rules for good porn:

1: Good porn should not have to beat you over the head with sex to get you horny.
2: Lust should /not/ be the overriding emotion. Make us laugh, make us cry, make us wonder, make us smile with an edge.
3: The mind needs sex as much as the body.
4: Physical attributes help, but they aren't the be-all end all.
5: Use as much creativity as possible.
6: A plot really doesn't hurt, especially if you're consistent to it.
7: You don't always have to be in-front vivid. A bit of mystery just makes it better.
8: There's absolutely nothing wrong with it being a little goofy and tender as well as lusty. Affection can go a long way. [livejournal.com profile] silentsteel
9: Erotic is worlds better than raunchy. [livejournal.com profile] silentsteel
10: Nobody should be wearing socks. [livejournal.com profile] avylin
11: Nobody should look drunk, sleepy, bored, drugged-out, or disgusted.[livejournal.com profile] avylin
12: Music should be dubbed into the video. Not played on an off screen stereo. [livejournal.com profile] flying_landon
13: The Wah-wah pedal, Saxophone, and bass guitar are instruments. Not constant noisemakers that should go as loud and fast as possible. [livejournal.com profile] spacemangroove
14: Blaring white lights just to make sure everything is visible need not apply. Sometimes the softer the light, and the darker the room, with just the right amount of candles, works more than having everything visible. [livejournal.com profile] ladylysander
15: Doggie Style is not the only 'wild' way to go. The ancients wrote an entire book of poses, try using them instead. [livejournal.com profile] ladylysander
16: For the love of god, stop shoving cameras up so close you see every wrinkle on the guy's love dingle.[livejournal.com profile] ladylysander
17: There should be more to talking dirty than, "Fuck me harder!" and, "You're a dirty slut, aren't you?!" [livejournal.com profile] nachitor
18: On the FFM threesome: The threesome is no fun unless all three people are involved at the same time, and in a significant way. Ladies, guys have no problem eating you out, why should you get squicked by eating out someone else? Think of it as mutual masturbation. [livejournal.com profile] spacemangroove
19: Foreplay is very interesting to see. Build up is very nice. Going straight to the deed right off is, well, stupid. Unless one is good to go now (which is very rare), things need to be well lubricated in order not to rub the wrong way. Capiche? [livejournal.com profile] skarlette
20: Come on lines, in virtually any situation not involving a massive orgy should involve something significantly more clever than the words, "Hey baby, wanna fuck?" [livejournal.com profile] spacemangroove


Any suggestions for what to add to the list? Keep giving them in the comments and I'll keep appending!

[identity profile] silentsteel.livejournal.com 2004-03-20 12:55 pm (UTC)(link)
8. There's absolutely nothing wrong with it being a little goofy and tender as well as lusty. Affection can go a long way.

9. Erotic is worlds better than raunchy.

:)

[identity profile] bzarcher.livejournal.com 2004-03-20 12:58 pm (UTC)(link)
Good, good.

[identity profile] avylin.livejournal.com 2004-03-20 03:00 pm (UTC)(link)
8. Nobody should be wearing socks.

9. Nobody should look drunk, sleepy, bored, drugged-out, or disgusted.

[identity profile] avylin.livejournal.com 2004-03-20 03:06 pm (UTC)(link)
Stockings are fine. But when everybody's naked, and one guy is wearing white athletic socks? That just throws it all off. Not that that kind of porn works for me anyway, but, like, I can't stop looking at his stupid socks.

[identity profile] bzarcher.livejournal.com 2004-03-20 03:09 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, I can see how that's a bit of a turn-off.

[identity profile] obliviousally.livejournal.com 2004-03-21 02:10 am (UTC)(link)
I'm SO glad I'm not the only one who thinks that! It's one of my craze pet peeves. >_o Stupid socks.

[identity profile] flying-landon.livejournal.com 2004-03-20 05:37 pm (UTC)(link)
Music should be dubbed into the video. Not played on an off screen stereo.

[identity profile] spacemangroove.livejournal.com 2004-03-20 06:58 pm (UTC)(link)
Just a personal bitch,but can we please remove the concept of the wah wah pedal from porn music. and perhaps the overuse of saxophone?

Thank you.

[identity profile] bzarcher.livejournal.com 2004-03-20 07:07 pm (UTC)(link)
I hear you. It'll be added in a moment.

[identity profile] flying-landon.livejournal.com 2004-03-21 06:33 am (UTC)(link)
Absolutely. Just make sure it's properly dubbed in.

[identity profile] ladylysander.livejournal.com 2004-03-20 07:56 pm (UTC)(link)
Blaring white lights just to make sure everything is visible need not apply. Sometimes the softer the light, and the darker the room, with just the right amount of candles, works more than having everything visible.

Doggie Style is not the only 'wild' way to go. The ancients wrote an entire book of poses, try using them instead.

And for the love of god, stop shoving cameras up so close you see every wrinkle on the guy's love dingle.

[identity profile] bzarcher.livejournal.com 2004-03-20 08:03 pm (UTC)(link)
I'll add these in a minute. But I just love the phrase Love Dingle.

[identity profile] nachitor.livejournal.com 2004-03-20 08:08 pm (UTC)(link)
I'll second that. "Love Dingle" is my new favourite phrase.

[identity profile] ladylysander.livejournal.com 2004-03-20 08:37 pm (UTC)(link)
Love dingle, What a wonderful phrase,
Love dingle, ain't no passin' craze,
It's what's between the knees,
Dangles down the legs...

.. I'll stop ripping off Disney and Something Posetive simultaniously now.

*bows*

[identity profile] nachitor.livejournal.com 2004-03-20 08:04 pm (UTC)(link)
There should be more to talking dirty than, "Fuck me harder!" and, "You're a dirty slut, aren't you?!"

It makes me cry.

[identity profile] keeperofdreams.livejournal.com 2004-03-21 01:31 am (UTC)(link)
....you don't mind when I say harder. :(

[identity profile] bzarcher.livejournal.com 2004-03-21 06:27 am (UTC)(link)
I think there's a difference between you in the moment and the porn actress who's faking it.

[identity profile] nachitor.livejournal.com 2004-03-21 03:47 pm (UTC)(link)
No, but that's not the only thing you say. Variety is the key!

[identity profile] keeperofdreams.livejournal.com 2004-03-21 03:52 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, it's not like I say much in...the... *glances around* first..place...uh, yeah. Nothing to see here, folks. Move right along...

[identity profile] spacemangroove.livejournal.com 2004-03-20 09:35 pm (UTC)(link)
On the FFM threesome:

The threesome is no fun unless all three people are involved at the same time, and in a significant way. Ladies, guys have no problem eating you out, why should you get squicked by eating out somoene else? Think of it as mutual masturbation.

[identity profile] skarlette.livejournal.com 2004-03-20 09:55 pm (UTC)(link)
Foreplay is very interesting to see. Build up is very nice. Going straight to the deed right off is well stupid. Unless one is well good to go now (which is very rare), things need to be well lubricated in order not to rub the wrong way. Capiche?

[identity profile] spacemangroove.livejournal.com 2004-03-22 08:07 am (UTC)(link)
On a related note:

Come on lines, in virtually any situation not involving a massive orgy should involve something significantly more clever than the words, "Hey baby, wanna fuck?" Which is how many porno scenes start, if there is any pre sex dialog at all. Sad really.

[identity profile] neversremedy.livejournal.com 2004-03-20 11:00 pm (UTC)(link)
Amen.

Quick! Someone give me a large budget and a half-decent crew, and I'll go make some low-budget porn with plots ... and continuity! And it might actually make you think or feel something beyond your crotch!

[identity profile] bzarcher.livejournal.com 2004-03-21 06:23 am (UTC)(link)
Yes! Now, there's a career idea for everyone I know who's having job troubles. We'll make a production company.

*Grins and raises her hand*

[identity profile] skarlette.livejournal.com 2004-03-21 08:56 am (UTC)(link)
Ooooh!! Can I work the front office? I'm good at that sort of thing.

*Laughs!*

[identity profile] bzarcher.livejournal.com 2004-03-21 08:57 am (UTC)(link)
Absolutely...

However, you realize this gives me so many naughty little openings...

Re: *Laughs!*

[identity profile] spacemangroove.livejournal.com 2004-03-21 09:22 am (UTC)(link)
Speaking of openings... (Heh, the almighty double entende(SP?) potential there...

Can you imagine the job interview at this theoretical company?

I can. Sounds like fodder for [livejournal.com profile] sexstories

[identity profile] bzarcher.livejournal.com 2004-03-21 10:12 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, I am all about a fine double entendre, as you know.

Actually, the job interview would be vital. We're going to need people with good intelligence, the ability to take, make, and run with jokes, and a real love of the job.

This cannot be 'just sex'. You have to enjoy what you're doing, and why you're doing it. And we'll want to hear your favorite author while you're at it.

Maybe even make favorite authors and movies part of the questionarie.

I wonder how hard it is to get venture capital for something like this.

[identity profile] spacemangroove.livejournal.com 2004-03-22 06:15 am (UTC)(link)
Hard to say...

I'll say this however, you'll never know how hard it is (*sigh*) until you try.

[identity profile] bzarcher.livejournal.com 2004-03-22 06:18 am (UTC)(link)
Well, shit. If the IT job market keeps bottoming on me, it could be as good a way to put bread on the table as any.