(no subject)
Dec. 3rd, 2006 01:08 amThey want to turn Rickenbacker into a space port.
They want to turn -Rickenbacker- into a space port?
I can't decide if this is one of the most awesome things I've ever heard, or one of the most improbable.
Why couldn't they have done this when I was, like, 8? I'd happily have stowed away on an orbital shot back then and probably not been noticed. Now I weigh too much to get onto a rocket without compromising the payload.
I wonder what sort of launches they'd be doing. Would we be able to see them from here?
The idea of sitting on my back porch in a lawn chair and watching them launch things into space is really attractive and fascinating.
They want to turn -Rickenbacker- into a space port?
I can't decide if this is one of the most awesome things I've ever heard, or one of the most improbable.
Why couldn't they have done this when I was, like, 8? I'd happily have stowed away on an orbital shot back then and probably not been noticed. Now I weigh too much to get onto a rocket without compromising the payload.
I wonder what sort of launches they'd be doing. Would we be able to see them from here?
The idea of sitting on my back porch in a lawn chair and watching them launch things into space is really attractive and fascinating.
no subject
Date: 2006-12-03 01:04 pm (UTC)Launch operations out of Rickenbacker could be problematic. You've got major jet airways in the airspace overhead, and a major population center not too far away for rockets to fall into....
no subject
Date: 2006-12-03 02:30 pm (UTC)Problematic, sure, but I'm sure they're arguing it's no worse than Kennedy or, for that matter, some of the issues faced by CMH, or a larger airport like LaGuardia.
no subject
Date: 2006-12-03 04:39 pm (UTC)Columbus is a great place for the assembly and logistical stuff, though.
no subject
Date: 2006-12-03 04:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-03 05:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-03 07:48 pm (UTC)Think about KLCK's location-- no real good place for one to land.
no subject
Date: 2006-12-03 09:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-04 04:29 am (UTC)