Page Summary
spiralpegasus.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ladyfoxfire.livejournal.com - (no subject)
bzarcher.livejournal.com - (no subject)
dklegman.livejournal.com - (no subject)
bzarcher.livejournal.com - (no subject)
litagemini.livejournal.com - (no subject)
dklegman.livejournal.com - *obligatory IMO Star Trek rant*
bzarcher.livejournal.com - (no subject)
big-daddy-shaun.livejournal.com - Well.
highbard.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2003-05-07 06:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-05-07 08:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-05-07 08:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-05-07 08:31 pm (UTC)I'm pretty sure Star Trek is now the proverbial Dead Horse.
no subject
Date: 2003-05-07 08:42 pm (UTC)Admittedly, I didn't like the original as much as TNG, and Babylon 5 did it better, and Roddenberry was a hack who just sold good writers, but...GEEZ.
no subject
Date: 2003-05-07 09:15 pm (UTC)Totally bullshit inDEED.
*obligatory IMO Star Trek rant*
Date: 2003-05-07 09:22 pm (UTC)I don't like to directly compare Babylon 5 to Star Trek since they do different things which both happen to involve space. ;-)
no subject
Date: 2003-05-07 09:23 pm (UTC)As to B5 vs Star Trek, I dunno. DS9 vs B5, true...
Oh, well.
Well.
Date: 2003-05-08 05:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-05-12 06:30 am (UTC)