Oh, I'm not talking about the comments--- I think the general quality and 'geek value' of stories that got posted went to hell in a handbasket in 2000. A spike of quality in late 2001 carried over into 2002... but overall?
I wouldn't say one is better than the other. Fark has a much broader appeal than Slashdot, and events/links/stuff get on the radar much faster at Fark. Slashdot has better commentary, but only along comparatively few (and generally technical) axes.
And Fark's photoshop contests, complete with cliches and the ridicule thereof, usually range from amusing to internet gold.
That said, my truck is identifiable by its /. sticker. :-)
I also mix my daily blogging with some Boing Boing and a bit of Metafilter, with some occasional Plastic when I need to read some severely snarky stuff.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-13 09:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-13 09:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-13 09:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-13 09:23 am (UTC)(I'm sticking to my slightly older school geek cred on this terminology.)
no subject
Date: 2004-04-13 09:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-13 09:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-13 09:34 am (UTC)I've been underwhelmed by the website.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-13 09:39 am (UTC)But, I agree it's a very up and down thing, by the nature of how they collect stories, but that's true of most operations like that.
Topics?
Date: 2004-04-13 11:31 am (UTC)That, and command-F-ing my way through the topics, searching for the word 'Funny'.
MacSlash has gone even further downhill, too. It's scary.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-13 03:47 pm (UTC)And Fark's photoshop contests, complete with cliches and the ridicule thereof, usually range from amusing to internet gold.
That said, my truck is identifiable by its /. sticker. :-)
I also mix my daily blogging with some Boing Boing and a bit of Metafilter, with some occasional Plastic when I need to read some severely snarky stuff.